Comments on: Tights are not pants

By: Nicole

Nicole — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:56:51 +0000

Aw–I really like this! I think the issue with tights for pants is when the tights aren’t 100% opaque.

By: punky

punky — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:42:30 +0000

GO back!!!

$3!!!!

By: Lauren

Lauren — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:43:55 +0000

ah I debated buying a pair of latex leggings today (they had some at target for $3), but i wasn’t sure what to pair with them! now i’m having buyer’s remorse for not getting them..

By: ryder

ryder — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:42:34 +0000

i like it. modern and hip. nice colors. glitter. it s really nice.

By: juliAM

juliAM — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:01:23 +0000

leggings = pants as far as im concerned. excepting the sheer and semi sheer variety. ewww.

By: Kristin

Kristin — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:45:14 +0000

your outfit is FANTASTIC, i need that shirt in my life

By: punky

punky — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:11:39 +0000

very good points

By: carly

carly — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:20:23 +0000

HAHA. ok but THAT GIRL was not working them like you are. she even changed into ballet flats halfway through….

By: Sophie

Sophie — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:41:46 +0000

Since when were tights NOT pants??! Some people are so strange, when I went home (small industrial city in the middle of England) I wore my red tights (as pants of course) and got all sorts of looks and comments of utter disbelief… WHAT??! And lets not even mention when I wore my patent riding boots over skinny pants with a perfect fit tee (kstreet) tucked in, you’d have thought I’d slapped someone’s mum with the looks i was getting.

Wear those pants/tights with pride girl!!

By: Connie

Connie — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:31:42 +0000

I enjoy this look.